Effect of training and supportive supervision on knowledge and practice of integrated diseases surveillance and response among primary health care workers in Kano State, Nigeria

  • Usman Sunusi Usman | usugwarzo@gmail.com Department of Public Health, Faculty of Basic Health Sciences, Bauchi State University, Gadau; Department of Public Health, Federal Medical Centre Birnin, Kudu, Nigeria.
  • Abubakar Muhammad Kurfi National Health Insurance Scheme, Kaduna Zonal Office, Nigeria.
  • Yusuf Abdu Misau Department of Community Medicine, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University of Technology, Bauchi, Nigeria; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Medical Sciences, Mount Kenya University, Kenya.
  • Umar Lawal Bello Department of Nursing Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.
  • Aliyu Muhammad Maigoro 1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Basic Health Sciences, Bauchi State University, Gadau, Nigeria.
  • Adam Ibrahim Abdullahi 1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Basic Health Sciences, Bauchi State University, Gadau, Nigeria.

Abstract

Communicable diseases continue to be major causes of, morbidity, mortality and rising health-care costs especially in developing countries. Integrated Diseases Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy was endorsed by Nigeria in 1998, as a means of strengthening communicable disease surveillance and response in order to make it more sensitive at all levels of government. A quasi-experimental study design was used to assess the effect of training and supportive supervision on knowledge and practice of IDSR among Primary Health Care (PHC) workers. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire, and analyzed with the aid of Epi info version 3.5.3. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. The mean knowledge score of IDSR at baseline was 28.9±9.7 in the study and 27.4±10.5 in the control group. However, after the intervention, it improved to 51.3±11.8 in the study and slightly changed to 27.1±10.6 in the control group (P<0.05). While, with regards to practice of IDSR, the mean practice scores improved in the study group from 6.43±1.25 to 16.37±3.86 after intervention (P<0.05). In the control group, however, the mean practice score changed from 6.89±1.36 to 8.45±2.75 (P<0.05) at the end of the study. The proportion of some IDSR core activity and supportive function changed from 0% and 16.6% to the standard benchmark of 80%. Training and retraining of health workers on IDSR were recommended as well as periodic supportive supervisory approach in order to enhance health workers capacity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2018-12-19
Section
Articles
Keywords:
IDSR, PHC workers, training and supportive supervision
Statistics
Abstract views: 134

PDF: 95
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Usman, Usman, Abubakar Kurfi, Yusuf Misau, Umar Bello, Aliyu Maigoro, and Adam Abdullahi. 2018. “Effect of Training and Supportive Supervision on Knowledge and Practice of Integrated Diseases Surveillance and Response Among Primary Health Care Workers in Kano State, Nigeria”. Annals of African Medical Research 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.4081/aamr.2018.30.